Matter of Santarella v. New York City Dep't of Corr.
This text of 424 N.E.2d 278 (Matter of Santarella v. New York City Dep't of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Commissioner of Correction reinstated.
In view of the consistent pattern of misconduct as found by the hearing officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Correction, we cannot say that the penalty of dismissal is so disproportionate to petitioner’s offenses as to mandate modification. (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233.) It is irrelevant that the necessary aims of discipline in the department could have been achieved by a less severe sanction.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 N.E.2d 278, 53 N.Y.2d 948, 441 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-santarella-v-new-york-city-dept-of-corr-ny-1981.