Matter of Santanam v. Board of Educ. of N. Syracuse Cent. Sch. Dist.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Santanam v. Board of Educ. of N. Syracuse Cent. Sch. Dist.

2018 NY Slip Op 980

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 2018

Docket107 CA 17-01256

StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 980 (Matter of Santanam v. Board of Educ. of N. Syracuse Cent. Sch. Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Santanam v. Board of Educ. of N. Syracuse Cent. Sch. Dist., 2018 NY Slip Op 980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Matter of Santanam v Board of Educ. of N. Syracuse Cent. Sch. Dist. (2018 NY Slip Op 00980)

Matter of Santanam v Board of Educ. of N. Syracuse Cent. Sch. Dist.

2018 NY Slip Op 00980

Decided on February 9, 2018

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 9, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

107 CA 17-01256

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF LINDA SANTANAM, JOHN KURYLA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF NORTH SYRACUSE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION AND NORTH SYRACUSE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,

v

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF NORTH SYRACUSE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ANNETTE SPEACH, IN HER CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF NORTH SYRACUSE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NORTH SYRACUSE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ALFRED RICCIO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS HEARING OFFICER, RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (DOUGLAS M. MCRAE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

ROBERT T. REILLY, LATHAM (MATTHEW E. BERGERON OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered September 29, 2016 pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment granted the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed as moot without costs (see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne , 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).

Entered: February 9, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI