Matter of Salvatore Y. (Chandel Y.)

2025 NY Slip Op 02496
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 25, 2025
Docket305 CAF 23-01102
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 02496 (Matter of Salvatore Y. (Chandel Y.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Salvatore Y. (Chandel Y.), 2025 NY Slip Op 02496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Matter of Salvatore Y. (Chandel Y.) (2025 NY Slip Op 02496)
Matter of Salvatore Y. (Chandel Y.)
2025 NY Slip Op 02496
Decided on April 25, 2025
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 25, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., MONTOUR, OGDEN, GREENWOOD, AND KEANE, JJ.

305 CAF 23-01102

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SALVATORE Y. ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; CHANDEL Y., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)


CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

SAM FADUSKI, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

JENNIFER M. LORENZ, ORCHARD PARK, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.



Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M. LoVallo, J.), entered June 6, 2023, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, revoked a suspended judgment and terminated the parental rights of respondent with respect to the subject child.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, respondent mother appeals from two orders by which Family Court revoked a suspended judgment entered upon her admission that she had permanently neglected the two subject children and terminated her parental rights with respect to those children. In both appeal No. 1 and appeal No. 2, we affirm. We conclude in each appeal that there is a sound and substantial basis in the record to support the court's determination that the mother failed to comply with the terms of the suspended judgment and that the interests of each child are best served by terminating the mother's parental rights (see Matter of Carter B. [Heather B.], 219 AD3d 1700, 1701 [4th Dept 2023], lv denied 41 NY3d 901 [2024]; Matter of Terry L.G., 6 AD3d 1144, 1145 [4th Dept 2004]).

Entered: April 25, 2025

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Terry L.G.
6 A.D.3d 1144 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Matter of Carter B. (Heather B.)
219 A.D.3d 1700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 02496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-salvatore-y-chandel-y-nyappdiv-2025.