Matter of Sacharoff v. Corsi

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Sacharoff v. Corsi

73 N.E.2d 42, 296 N.Y. 927, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1689

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 1947

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 73 N.E.2d 42 (Matter of Sacharoff v. Corsi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Sacharoff v. Corsi, 73 N.E.2d 42, 296 N.Y. 927, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1689 (N.Y. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Division, insofar as it affirms the decision of the respondent Goodman as Acting Industrial Commissioner, sustaining the fourth specification in the bill of particulars of charges against the appellant, reversed on the ground that the evidence is insufficient in law to sustain the charge. The order, insofar as it affirms the decision of the respondent Goodman sustaining the first specification in the bill of particulars affirmed, but inasmuch as it does not conclusively appear that the Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board would deem the action taken in this proceeding, predicated as it is upon specifications one and four of the bill of particulars, to be appropriate when unsupported by the decision by the Industrial Commissioner upon specification four, which we now reverse, the proceeding is remitted to the Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, for action under subdivision 2 of section 13-d of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, without costs.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Appellate Division, insofar as it affirms the decision of the respondent Goodman as Acting Industrial Commissioner, sustaining the fourth specification in the bill of particulars of charges against the appellant, reversed on the ground that the evidence is insufficient in law to sustain the charge. The order, insofar as it affirms the decision of the respondent Goodman sustaining the first specification in the bill of particulars affirmed, but inasmuch as it does not conclusively appear that the Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board would deem the action taken in this proceeding, predicated as it is upon specifications one and four of the bill of particulars, to be appropriate when unsupported by the decision by the Industrial Commissioner upon specification four, which we now reverse, the proceeding is remitted to the Chairman of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, for action under subdivision 2 of section 13-d of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, without costs.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 N.E.2d 42, 296 N.Y. 927, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 1689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-sacharoff-v-corsi-ny-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack