Matter of Sabiev v. Titus

2025 NY Slip Op 04251
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 23, 2025
Docket2025-07065
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 04251 (Matter of Sabiev v. Titus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Sabiev v. Titus, 2025 NY Slip Op 04251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Matter of Sabiev v Titus (2025 NY Slip Op 04251)

Matter of Sabiev v Titus
2025 NY Slip Op 04251
Decided on July 23, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 23, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ROBERT J. MILLER, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
DEBORAH A. DOWLING
JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

2025-07065

[*1]In the Matter of Anton Sabiev, petitioner,

v

Michele Titus, etc., et al., respondents.


Anton Sabiev, Tariffville, Connecticut, petitioner pro se.



DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Michele Titus, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to decide certain motions in an underlying civil action entitled Gandrabur v Sabiev , pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under Index No. 724179/20, and to direct the recusal of the respondent Michele Titus from that action.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman , 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

MILLER, J.P., WOOTEN, DOWLING and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 04251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-sabiev-v-titus-nyappdiv-2025.