MATTER OF RUSSELL v. Selsky
853 N.E.2d 236, 7 N.Y.3d 750, 819 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2006 NY Slip Op 71226, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3194
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that appellant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF RUSSELL v. Selsky, 853 N.E.2d 236, 7 N.Y.3d 750, 819 N.Y.S.2d 866, 2006 NY Slip Op 71226, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 3194 (N.Y. 2006).
853 N.E.2d 236 (MATTER OF RUSSELL v. Selsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.