Matter of Rothschild

New York Court of Appeals

Matter of Rothschild

195 N.E. 222, 266 N.Y. 609, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1484

DecidedMarch 5, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 195 N.E. 222 (Matter of Rothschild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Rothschild, 195 N.E. 222, 266 N.Y. 609, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1484 (N.Y. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for reargument is denied. The disposition of the matter made below can leave no shadow of moral obliquity or of unprofessional conduct on appellant. The services rendered to his client were reasonably worth the sum claimed by him. He was not without ground for believing he was entitled to that sum. He was certainly entitled to litigate a fair dispute without being charged with wrongdoing. There was no wrongdoing of any kind, and the phrase “ wrongfully withheld ” in the title hereto, is no doubt an unintentional misdescription.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for reargument is denied. The disposition of the matter made below can leave no shadow of moral obliquity or of unprofessional conduct on appellant. The services rendered to his client were reasonably worth the sum claimed by him. He was not without ground for believing he was entitled to that sum. He was certainly entitled to litigate a fair dispute without being charged with wrongdoing. There was no wrongdoing of any kind, and the phrase “ wrongfully withheld ” in the title hereto, is no doubt an unintentional misdescription.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 N.E. 222, 266 N.Y. 609, 1935 N.Y. LEXIS 1484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rothschild-ny-1935.