Matter of Rossi v. New York City Dept. of Parks & Recreation

2017 NY Slip Op 2762, 149 A.D.3d 481, 49 N.Y.S.3d 891
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 11, 2017
Docket100635/14 3676 100845/13 3675
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2762 (Matter of Rossi v. New York City Dept. of Parks & Recreation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Rossi v. New York City Dept. of Parks & Recreation, 2017 NY Slip Op 2762, 149 A.D.3d 481, 49 N.Y.S.3d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan B. Lobis), entered May 2, 2016, denying petitioner Morris’s petition to compel respondent New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) to issue Morris a restricted area mobile food cart permit, and granting DOHMH’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), entered May 13, 2016, which denied petitioner Rossi’s petition to compel respondent New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) to provide Rossi written authorization to operate a mobile food vending cart on land under its jurisdiction, and granted DPR’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*482 Contrary to petitioners’ contentions, requiring them to obtain special vending licenses pursuant to General Business Law § 35-a to vend on property under DPR’s jurisdiction does not divest DOHMH of its powers to regulate mobile food vendors. DOHMH licenses mobile food vendors and food vending carts in New York City. Vendors, including food vendors, seeking to avail themselves of the vending terms available to disabled veterans must comply with the additional licensing requirements applicable to disabled veterans, which in New York City are set forth in General Business Law § 35-a (see Matter of Rossi v New York City Dept. of Parks & Recreation, 127 AD3d 463 [1st Dept 2015]).

We have considered petitioners’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Andrias, Moskow-itz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shah v. City of New York
2025 NY Slip Op 32766(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 2762, 149 A.D.3d 481, 49 N.Y.S.3d 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rossi-v-new-york-city-dept-of-parks-recreation-nyappdiv-2017.