Matter of Ross v. Rodriguez

2024 NY Slip Op 01371
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 14, 2024
DocketCV-23-1258
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 01371 (Matter of Ross v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Ross v. Rodriguez, 2024 NY Slip Op 01371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Matter of Ross v Rodriguez (2024 NY Slip Op 01371)
Matter of Ross v Rodriguez
2024 NY Slip Op 01371
Decided on March 14, 2024
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:March 14, 2024

CV-23-1258

[*1]In the Matter of Alonzo Ross, Petitioner,

v

Anthony Rodriguez, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.


Calendar Date:February 9, 2024
Before:Garry, P.J., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ.

Alonzo Ross, Stormville, petitioner pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Kate H. Nepveu of counsel), for respondent.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a tier III determination finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the underlying determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's account. Given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, this proceeding is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Perkins v Annucci, 216 AD3d 1388, 1388 [3d Dept 2023]; Matter of Harrell v Annucci, 208 AD3d 1533, 1533 [3d Dept 2022]).

Garry, P.J., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Harrell v. Annucci
208 A.D.3d 1533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 01371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ross-v-rodriguez-nyappdiv-2024.