Matter of Rosenthal v. Weiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Rosenthal v. Weiss

129 A.D.3d 738, 8 N.Y.S.3d 916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 2015

Docket2014-07117

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 129 A.D.3d 738 (Matter of Rosenthal v. Weiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Rosenthal v. Weiss, 129 A.D.3d 738, 8 N.Y.S.3d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Sherri L. Eisenpress, J.), dated June 16, 2014. The order denied the father’s objections to an order of the same court (Catherine M. Miklitsch, S.M.), dated March 30, 2014, which, without a hearing, dismissed the father’s petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order dated June 16, 2014, is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court properly denied his objections to an order of a Support Magistrate dismissing, without a hearing, his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation. The father failed to make a prima facie showing of “a substantial change in circumstances” (Family Ct Act § 451 [3] [a]; see Matter of Bono v Pitre, 97 AD3d 743 [2012]).

Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Sherri L. Eisenpress, J.), dated June 16, 2014. The order denied the father’s objections to an order of the same court (Catherine M. Miklitsch, S.M.), dated March 30, 2014, which, without a hearing, dismissed the father’s petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order dated June 16, 2014, is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the Family Court properly denied his objections to an order of a Support Magistrate dismissing, without a hearing, his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation. The father failed to make a prima facie showing of “a substantial change in circumstances” (Family Ct Act § 451 [3] [a]; see Matter of Bono v Pitre, 97 AD3d 743 [2012]).

Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Sgroi and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 A.D.3d 738, 8 N.Y.S.3d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rosenthal-v-weiss-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack