Matter of Rosenbush v. Keller
This text of 2 N.E.2d 659 (Matter of Rosenbush v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was not entitled to resort to the remedy of mandamus without availing herself of the right to appeal to the Board of Standards and Appeals. (Matter of Towers Management Corp. v. Thatcher, 271 N. Y. 94; decided May 19, 1936.) That Board is also empowered on a proper application to consider the argument here made on the basis of unnecessary hardship. (Amended Building Zone Resolution, § 21; see New York Code of Ordinances, Appendix B.)
The order should be affirmed, without costs.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 N.E.2d 659, 271 N.Y. 282, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rosenbush-v-keller-ny-1936.