Matter of Rosbar Co. v. Bd. of Appeals of the City of Long Beach

420 N.E.2d 969, 53 N.Y.2d 623, 438 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2294
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 420 N.E.2d 969 (Matter of Rosbar Co. v. Bd. of Appeals of the City of Long Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Rosbar Co. v. Bd. of Appeals of the City of Long Beach, 420 N.E.2d 969, 53 N.Y.2d 623, 438 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2294 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The prior nonfinal order of the Appellate Division dated January 22, 1979 having been reviewed, the order of that court dated July 7, 1980 should be affirmed, with costs.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of the board of appeals that there had been such a change in use of the subject premises as to cause it to lose its nonconforming status. There was proof that what was in essence a seasonal summer hotel had been converted to a year-round facility for senior citizens with a consequent significant increase in demand for municipal services. Nor does this case present any occasion to make an exception to the general rule that the doctrine of estoppel is not applicable to preclude a municipality from enforcing the provisions of its zoning ordinance.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Andes v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Riverhead
2023 NY Slip Op 03009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
DeFalco v. DeChance
949 F. Supp. 2d 422 (E.D. New York, 2013)
Ganco, Inc. v. City Planning Board
244 A.D.2d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Castore v. Breite
167 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Mt. Lyell Enterprises, Inc. v. DeRooy
159 A.D.2d 1015 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Cos-Lin, Inc. v. Spring Lake Bd. of Adjustment
534 A.2d 44 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Cymbidium Development Corp. v. Smith
133 A.D.2d 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Carcuro v. Madigan
124 A.D.2d 294 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Commco, Inc. v. Amelkin
465 N.E.2d 314 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Garcia v. Holze
94 A.D.2d 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Stein v. City of Newburgh
90 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Albert v. Board of Standards & Appeals of the City of New York
89 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Cohalan v. Lechtrecker
84 A.D.2d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 N.E.2d 969, 53 N.Y.2d 623, 438 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rosbar-co-v-bd-of-appeals-of-the-city-of-long-beach-ny-1981.