Matter of Rosa M. v. Francisco P.

2017 NY Slip Op 4394, 151 A.D.3d 451, 53 N.Y.S.3d 525
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 6, 2017·No. 4171·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Gail A. Adams, Ref.), entered on or about February 8, 2016, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, modified a visitation order to provide for overnight visitation with the parties’ child every Wednesday until April 14, 2016, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The temporary visitation order is not an order of disposition and thus not appealable as of right (see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; Matter of Holtzman v Holtzman, 47 AD2d 620 [1st Dept 1975]), and we decline to review it (see id.). Moreover, the appeal is moot, as the temporary order has already expired (see Matter of Sasha B. [Erica B.], 73 AD3d 587, 587 [1st Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 16 NY3d 755 [2011]).

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Richter, Feinman, Gische and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Rosa M. v. Francisco P., 2017 NY Slip Op 4394, 151 A.D.3d 451, 53 N.Y.S.3d 525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 4394 (Matter of Rosa M. v. Francisco P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Charles R. v. Diana E.
2019 NY Slip Op 5493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)