Matter of Rolando A.G. v. Marisol R.M.

2019 NY Slip Op 4268
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 30, 2019
Docket9466 9465
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 4268 (Matter of Rolando A.G. v. Marisol R.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Rolando A.G. v. Marisol R.M., 2019 NY Slip Op 4268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Matter of Rolando A.G. v Marisol R.M. (2019 NY Slip Op 04268)
Matter of Rolando A.G. v Marisol R.M.
2019 NY Slip Op 04268
Decided on May 30, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 30, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Webber, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

9466 9465

[*1]In re Rolando A.G., Petitioner-Appellant,

v

Marisol R.M., Respondent-Respondent.


Larry S. Bachner, New York, for appellant.

Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Riti P. Singh of counsel), attorney for the child.



Appeal from order, Family Court, Bronx County (Robert D. Hettleman, J.), entered on or about August 2, 2017, which denied petitioner father's petition to suspend respondent mother's overnight and unsupervised visits with the subject child, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

Application by the father's assigned counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]). A review of the record demonstrates that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on this appeal. The interim order is not appealable as of right, as it was issued in an Article 6 proceeding, and the father did not seek leave to appeal. Furthermore, the interim order is moot since it was superceded by

a subsequent order granting the mother overnight visits and the father has not alleged any further incidents of inadequate care of the child (see Matter of Jadalynn N. [Louis N.], 147 AD3d 636 [1st Dept 2017]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: MAY 30, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Matter of Jadalynn N. (Louis N.)
2017 NY Slip Op 1445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 4268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rolando-ag-v-marisol-rm-nyappdiv-2019.