Matter of Rogalin v. N.Y. City Teachers' Retirement Bd
This text of 49 N.E.2d 623 (Matter of Rogalin v. N.Y. City Teachers' Retirement Bd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ. Lehman, Ch. J., Finch and Lewis, JJ., dissent on the ground that the filing of charges and suspension from a position in the public service terminates such service conditionally or at least interrupts it and retirement must await restoration to the public service. (Matter of Eberle v. La Guardia, 285 N. Y. 247.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 N.E.2d 623, 290 N.Y. 664, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rogalin-v-ny-city-teachers-retirement-bd-ny-1943.