Matter of Roberts v. . J.F. Newcomb Company
138 N.E. 443, 234 N.Y. 553, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 734
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, Ch. J., and McLaughlin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Roberts v. . J.F. Newcomb Company, 138 N.E. 443, 234 N.Y. 553, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 734 (N.Y. 1922).
138 N.E. 443 (Matter of Roberts v. . J.F. Newcomb Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montaner v. Industrial Commission
57 P.R. 226 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1940)
Montaner v. Comisión Industrial
57 P.R. Dec. 233 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1940)
Ridenour v. Lewis
238 N.W. 745 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1931)
Frigidaire Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission
283 P. 974 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Claim of Dependents of Marks v. Gray
167 N.E. 181 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)
City of Fremont v. Lea
213 N.W. 820 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1927)
Matter of McCarter v. Larock
148 N.E. 523 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)