MATTER OF ROBBINS v. Schechter

New York Court of Appeals

MATTER OF ROBBINS v. Schechter

151 N.E.2d 613, 4 N.Y.2d 935

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 15, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 N.E.2d 613 (MATTER OF ROBBINS v. Schechter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MATTER OF ROBBINS v. Schechter, 151 N.E.2d 613, 4 N.Y.2d 935 (N.Y. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

4 N.Y.2d 935 (1958)

In the Matter of Harold Robbins et al., Appellants,
v.
Joseph Schechter, as Chairman of the City Civil Service Commission, City of New York, et al., Respondents, and Elmer C. Cone et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 25, 1958. Decided May 15, 1958.

Murray A. Gordon for appellants.

Milton M. Mokotoff for John D. Sullivan and others, amici curię, in support of appellants' position.

Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (Anthony Curreri, Seymour B. Quel and Albert Cooper of counsel), for respondents.

Samuel Resnicoff for intervenors-respondents.

Orest V. Maresca for Ferdinand Catalano and others, amici curię, in support of respondents' position.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

4 N.Y.2d 935 (1958)

In the Matter of Harold Robbins et al., Appellants,
v.
Joseph Schechter, as Chairman of the City Civil Service Commission, City of New York, et al., Respondents, and Elmer C. Cone et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued February 25, 1958. Decided May 15, 1958.

Murray A. Gordon for appellants.

Milton M. Mokotoff for John D. Sullivan and others, amici curię, in support of appellants' position.

Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (Anthony Curreri, Seymour B. Quel and Albert Cooper of counsel), for respondents.

Samuel Resnicoff for intervenors-respondents.

Orest V. Maresca for Ferdinand Catalano and others, amici curię, in support of respondents' position.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 N.E.2d 613, 4 N.Y.2d 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-robbins-v-schechter-ny-1958.

Opinion

In the Matter of Harold Robbins et al., Appellants, v. Joseph Schechter, as Chairman of the City Civil Service Commission, City of New York, et al., Respondents, and Elmer C. Cone et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Matter of Harold Robbins et al., Appellants,
v.
Joseph Schechter, as Chairman of the City Civil Service Commission, City of New York, et al., Respondents, and Elmer C. Cone et al., Intervenors-Respondents.