Matter of Rivera v. Berlin

141 A.D.3d 423, 33 N.Y.S.3d 891
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 5, 2016·No. 1669N 402582/12·Published

Opinion

*424 Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered April 8, 2015, which, upon renewal, denied petitioner’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to CPLR article 86, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner, inter alia, sought to compel respondent New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) to comply with respondent New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance’s (OTDA) direction that it redetermine petitioner’s eligibility for public assistance benefits and food stamps and/or restore any lost benefits retroactively. Petitioner had successfully challenged HRA’s determinations at four fair hearings before OTDA, but was unable to secure HRA’s compliance with OTDA’s decisions after fair hearing until this lawsuit. While this lawsuit prompted HRA to change its position, it had no such effect on OTDA, which had consistently sided with petitioner. Therefore, she is not entitled to an award of attorney’s fees under New York’s Equal Access to Justice Act (CPLR art 86) (see Matter of Solla v Berlin, 24 NY3d 1192, 1195 [2015]; see also Hernandez v Hammons, 98 NY2d 735 [2002]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Acosta, Feinman, Kapnick and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Rivera v. Berlin, 141 A.D.3d 423, 33 N.Y.S.3d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

141 A.D.3d 423 (Matter of Rivera v. Berlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Luz Solla v. Elizabeth Berlin
27 N.E.3d 462 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
Hernandez v. Hammons
780 N.E.2d 498 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)