Matter of Rivas v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Rivas v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision

125 A.D.3d 1030, 999 N.Y.S.2d 769

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 5, 2015

Docket519084

StatusPublished

This text of 125 A.D.3d 1030 (Matter of Rivas v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Rivas v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, 125 A.D.3d 1030, 999 N.Y.S.2d 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a de *1031 termination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of drug use after his urine sample tested positive for the presence of THC. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge refunded to his inmate account. Although not mentioned by the Attorney General, we note that “any loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the determination should be restored” (Matter of Benitez v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1237, 1238 [2014] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). Otherwise, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Martinez v Prack, 120 AD3d 1467, 1467 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a de *1031 termination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of drug use after his urine sample tested positive for the presence of THC. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge refunded to his inmate account. Although not mentioned by the Attorney General, we note that “any loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the determination should be restored” (Matter of Benitez v Fischer, 118 AD3d 1237, 1238 [2014] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). Otherwise, petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Martinez v Prack, 120 AD3d 1467, 1467 [2014]).

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Rose and Clark, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 A.D.3d 1030, 999 N.Y.S.2d 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rivas-v-new-york-state-department-of-corrections-and-community-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack