Matter of Ring v. Ring

140 A.D.3d 1075, 33 N.Y.S.3d 749
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 2016·No. 2015-01893·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Dennis Lebwohl, J.), dated Febru *1076 ary 26, 2015. The order, without a hearing, granted the father’s motion to dismiss the mother’s petition, inter alia, to modify a prior order of custody so as to allow for visitation with the subject child.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

Since the subject child has reached the age of 18, he is no longer subject to the order appealed from, and the appeal from the order must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Chana J.A. v Barry S., 135 AD3d 743, 743 [2016]; Matter of Fowler v Rivera, 134 AD3d 708, 709 [2015]; Matter of Julian B. v Williams, 97 AD3d 671, 671 [2012]).

Eng, P.J., Roman, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Ring v. Ring, 140 A.D.3d 1075, 33 N.Y.S.3d 749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

140 A.D.3d 1075 (Matter of Ring v. Ring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Rodriguez v. Sabbat
2020 NY Slip Op 4170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Price v. Jenkins
2017 NY Slip Op 2997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)