Matter of Ricardo M.J. (Kiomara A.)

2016 NY Slip Op 6663, 143 A.D.3d 503, 38 N.Y.S.3d 196
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 11, 2016
Docket1864 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 6663 (Matter of Ricardo M.J. (Kiomara A.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Ricardo M.J. (Kiomara A.), 2016 NY Slip Op 6663, 143 A.D.3d 503, 38 N.Y.S.3d 196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Erik S. Pitchal, J.), entered on or about March 21, 2014, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about November 13, 2013, which found that respondent mother neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition. The record supports the court’s determination that the mother neglected the child by inflicting excessive corporal punishment on him. The social worker testified that the child reported that the mother beat him with a belt with spikes “all the time,” the mother admitted beating him, and he appeared to be afraid of her. His out of court statements were corroborated by the bruises the social worker observed on the child’s body and the statements the child made to the detective (see Matter of Joshua B., 28 AD3d 759, 761 [2d Dept 2006]; Matter of Samara M., 19 AD3d 214 [1st Dept 2005]).

The court’s credibility assessment is entitled to the “greatest respect” on appeal (see Matter of Irene O., 38 NY2d 776, 777 [1975]), and is supported by the record in that the mother provided varying explanations for the bruises on the child’s body (see Matter of Mia B. [Brandy R.], 100 AD3d 569, 569-570 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 858 [2013]).

We have considered the mother’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.R, Sweeny, Acosta, Moskowitz and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of I.L.A. (Kiomara A.)
2024 NY Slip Op 06113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Balle S. (Tristian S.)
2021 NY Slip Op 02914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Matthew C. (Joshua L.)
2020 NY Slip Op 2876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Mariah B. (Nigel M.)
2019 NY Slip Op 9377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 NY Slip Op 6663, 143 A.D.3d 503, 38 N.Y.S.3d 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-ricardo-mj-kiomara-a-nyappdiv-2016.