Matter of Raymond Castro v. Dora Schriro
This text of Matter of Raymond Castro v. Dora Schriro (Matter of Raymond Castro v. Dora Schriro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
================================================================= This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 88 SSM 13 In the Matter of Raymond Castro, Respondent, v. Dora Schriro, &c., et al. Appellants.
Submitted by Ingrid R. Gustafson, for appellants. Submitted by Liam L. Castro, for respondent.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Under the circumstances presented, the Appellate Division correctly held that the petition stated a claim for improper termination. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.
Decided June 1, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Matter of Raymond Castro v. Dora Schriro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-raymond-castro-v-dora-schriro-ny-2017.