Matter of Rand v. 610 Smith St. Corp.

132 A.D.3d 408, 16 N.Y.S.3d 736
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 2015
Docket650891/13 -15754 15753 15752
StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.3d 408 (Matter of Rand v. 610 Smith St. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Rand v. 610 Smith St. Corp., 132 A.D.3d 408, 16 N.Y.S.3d 736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered October 15, 2014, inter alia, awarding petitioner a sum of money for the fair value of her shares in respondent 610 Smith Street Corporation, and awarding her fees and expenses, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The trial court’s valuation of petitioner’s shares in respon *409 dent 610 Smith Street Corporation is amply supported by the record (see Matter of Cohen v Four Way Features, 240 AD2d 225 [1st Dept 1997]). The court was not bound to accept respondents’ expert’s estimate of $6.1 million for the environmental remediation of the corporation’s sole asset, a commercial warehouse in Brooklyn, for which there is no other basis in the record; the court’s finding that $1 million is the correct estimate is supported by the trial evidence. The trial court properly awarded fees and costs to petitioner pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 623 (h) (7).

We have considered respondents’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Acosta, Moskowitz and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Four Way Features, Inc.
240 A.D.2d 225 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D.3d 408, 16 N.Y.S.3d 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-rand-v-610-smith-st-corp-nyappdiv-2015.