Matter of Quinn

115 N.E. 442, 220 N.Y. 623, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1075
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 1917·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*624 Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed under the provisions of section 314 of the Election Law, which is broad enough in its terms to entitle any candidate voted for at the time of a general election to an examination as of right in a proper case of any ballots upon which his name lawfully appears as that of a candidate whether the validity of the election is in controversy or not. The provisions of section 61 of the Town Law relating to an examination and recount of ballots in case of contests provides a wholly distinct and different remedy.

The order should, be affirmed, with costs.

Hiscock, Oh. J., Chase, Collin, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Quinn, 115 N.E. 442, 220 N.Y. 623, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1075 (N.Y. 1917).

115 N.E. 442 (Matter of Quinn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Oliver
234 A.D. 170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
In re Barrett
209 A.D. 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Matter of Whitman. No. 1
121 N.E. 479 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
In re Whitman
185 A.D. 228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)