Matter of Pyser

203 A.D.3d 1304, 160 N.Y.S.3d 680, 2022 NY Slip Op 01375
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 3, 2022
DocketPM-46-22
StatusPublished

This text of 203 A.D.3d 1304 (Matter of Pyser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Pyser, 203 A.D.3d 1304, 160 N.Y.S.3d 680, 2022 NY Slip Op 01375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Matter of Pyser (2022 NY Slip Op 01375)
Matter of Pyser
2022 NY Slip Op 01375
Decided on March 3, 2022
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:March 3, 2022

PM-46-22

[*1]In the Matter of Steven Mark Pyser, an Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 4379467.)


Calendar Date:February 28, 2022
Before:Lynch, J.P., Clark, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ.

Steven Mark Pyser, Washington, DC, pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.



Per Curiam.

Steven Mark Pyser was admitted to practice by this Court in 2006 and lists a business address in Washington, DC with the Office of Court Administration. Pyser now seeks leave to resign from the New York bar for nondisciplinary reasons (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [a]). The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) advises that it does not oppose Pyser's application.

Upon reading Pyser's affidavit sworn to January 11, 2022 and filed January 18, 2022, and upon reading the February 23, 2022 correspondence in response by the Chief Attorney for AGC, and having determined that Pyser is eligible to resign for nondisciplinary reasons, we grant his application and accept his resignation.

Lynch, J.P., Clark, Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that Steven Mark Pyser's application for permission to resign is granted and his nondisciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that Steven Mark Pyser's name is hereby stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court (see generally Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.22 [b]); and it is further

ORDERED that Steven Mark Pyser is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and Pyser is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is further

ORDERED that Steven Mark Pyser shall, within 30 days of the date of this decision, surrender to the Office of Court Administration any Attorney Secure Pass issued to him.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 A.D.3d 1304, 160 N.Y.S.3d 680, 2022 NY Slip Op 01375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-pyser-nyappdiv-2022.