Matter of P.T. & L. Contr. Corp. v. Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of P.T. & L. Contr. Corp. v. Rivera

134 A.D.3d 722, 19 N.Y.S.3d 769

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 2, 2015

Docket2015-01128

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.D.3d 722 (Matter of P.T. & L. Contr. Corp. v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of P.T. & L. Contr. Corp. v. Rivera, 134 A.D.3d 722, 19 N.Y.S.3d 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and Labor Law § 220 (8) to review a determination and order of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor dated August 6, 2014, which adopted the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of a hearing officer, made after a hearing, inter alia, that the petitioners willfully failed to pay certain employees prevailing wages and supplements. Motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding as time-barred and cross motion by petitioners to deem the petition and notice of petition timely filed nunc pro tunc.

Ordered that the respondent’s motion is granted and the petitioners’ cross motion is denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, with costs.

The petitioners commenced the instant proceeding more than 30 days after service upon them of the notice of the filing of the challenged determination and order in the Office of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor. Accordingly, we grant the respondent’s motion to dismiss this proceeding as time-barred, deny the petitioners’ cross motion, and dismiss the proceeding (see Labor Law § 220 [8]; Matter of N. Picco & Sons Contr., Inc. v Smith, 77 AD3d 668, 668 [2010]; Matter of Local 237, Intl. Bhd. of Teamsters v Comptroller of City of N.Y., 259 AD2d 314, 314 [1999]; Bolovis v Polis Contr. Corp., 235 AD2d 323, 323 [1997]). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and Labor Law § 220 (8) to review a determination and order of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor dated August 6, 2014, which adopted the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of a hearing officer, made after a hearing, inter alia, that the petitioners willfully failed to pay certain employees prevailing wages and supplements. Motion by the respondent to dismiss the proceeding as time-barred and cross motion by petitioners to deem the petition and notice of petition timely filed nunc pro tunc.

Ordered that the respondent’s motion is granted and the petitioners’ cross motion is denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, with costs.

The petitioners commenced the instant proceeding more than 30 days after service upon them of the notice of the filing of the challenged determination and order in the Office of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Labor. Accordingly, we grant the respondent’s motion to dismiss this proceeding as time-barred, deny the petitioners’ cross motion, and dismiss the proceeding (see Labor Law § 220 [8]; Matter of N. Picco & Sons Contr., Inc. v Smith, 77 AD3d 668, 668 [2010]; Matter of Local 237, Intl. Bhd. of Teamsters v Comptroller of City of N.Y., 259 AD2d 314, 314 [1999]; Bolovis v Polis Contr. Corp., 235 AD2d 323, 323 [1997]). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.3d 722, 19 N.Y.S.3d 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-pt-l-contr-corp-v-rivera-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack