Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision
This text of 42 N.Y.3d 936 (Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision (2024 NY Slip Op 03199)
| Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision |
| 2024 NY Slip Op 03199 [42 NY3d 936] |
| June 13, 2024 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, October 9, 2024 |
[*1]
| In the Matter of Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, Appellant, v New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent. |
Argued May 16, 2024; decided June 13, 2024
Matter of Prisoners' Legal Servs. of N.Y. v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 209 AD3d 1208, affirmed.
Karen Murtagh, Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, Albany (Matthew McGowan of counsel), for appellant.
Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Beezly J. Kiernan, Barbara D. Underwood and Jeffrey W. Lang of counsel), for respondent.
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division insofar as appealed from, as limited by the briefs, should be affirmed, without costs.
This Court's review is limited to whether the Appellate Division abused its discretion in declining to invoke the mootness exception to review the merits of certain of petitioner's challenges in this proceeding. There was no abuse of discretion here (see Matter of David C., 69 NY2d 796, 798 [1987]; Matter of Anonymous, 55 NY2d 1021, 1022 [1982]).
Chief Judge Wilson and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Singas, Cannataro, Troutman and Halligan concur.
Order insofar as appealed from, as limited by the briefs, affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 N.Y.3d 936, 2024 NY Slip Op 03199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-prisoners-legal-servs-of-ny-v-new-york-state-dept-of-corr-ny-2024.