Matter of Povlitzki

California Court of Appeal

Matter of Povlitzki

251 P. 940, 80 Cal. App. 410, 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 47

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 22, 1926

DocketDocket No. 1461.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 P. 940 (Matter of Povlitzki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Povlitzki, 251 P. 940, 80 Cal. App. 410, 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 47 (Cal. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

WORKS, P. J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is detained under a commitment issued pursuant to a preliminary examination upon a charge of failure to provide for his wife, under the provisions of section 270a of the Penal Code. Several points are made by the petitioner, but we deem it necessary to refer to but one of them. The rule is that the prosecution in such a case must show that the wife has no means of support, other than that to be derived from her husband, whereby to provide herself with the necessaries contemplated by the section (People v. Smith, 31 Cal. App. 736 [161 Pac. 753]). The testimony at the preliminary examination in the present *411 instance shows a failure of evidence upon that point. There is, in truth, affirmative evidence in the record which tends to show that the wife did have independent means. Petitioner was therefore committed by the magistrate without probable cause.

There is a statement in the petition that a charge is pending against petitioner for a failure to provide for his children, but there is no showing, either in the petition or in the return, that he either is or is not held in custody pursuant to that charge. In dealing with the question before us, therefore, we contemplate only the commitment issued pursuant to the preliminary examination already mentioned, and not any commitment which may have been issued upon the charge as to the children.

The petitioner is discharged from custody.

Craig, J., and Thompson, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WORKS, P. J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is detained under a commitment issued pursuant to a preliminary examination upon a charge of failure to provide for his wife, under the provisions of section 270a of the Penal Code. Several points are made by the petitioner, but we deem it necessary to refer to but one of them. The rule is that the prosecution in such a case must show that the wife has no means of support, other than that to be derived from her husband, whereby to provide herself with the necessaries contemplated by the section (People v. Smith, 31 Cal. App. 736 [161 Pac. 753]). The testimony at the preliminary examination in the present *411 instance shows a failure of evidence upon that point. There is, in truth, affirmative evidence in the record which tends to show that the wife did have independent means. Petitioner was therefore committed by the magistrate without probable cause.

There is a statement in the petition that a charge is pending against petitioner for a failure to provide for his children, but there is no showing, either in the petition or in the return, that he either is or is not held in custody pursuant to that charge. In dealing with the question before us, therefore, we contemplate only the commitment issued pursuant to the preliminary examination already mentioned, and not any commitment which may have been issued upon the charge as to the children.

The petitioner is discharged from custody.

Craig, J., and Thompson, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 P. 940, 80 Cal. App. 410, 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-povlitzki-calctapp-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack