Matter of Poucher v. Teachers' R. Board

164 N.E. 335, 249 N.Y. 414, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 823
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

' An application by a teacher for service retirement under Greater New York charter (Sec. 1092, subd. K) is not effective until delivered, and such delivery does not result from a mere deposit in the mails (Crown Point Iron Co. v. Ætna Insurance Co., 127 N. Y. 608; Peabody v. Satterlee, 166 N. Y. 174).

The order of the Appellate Division and that of the Special Term should be reversed and the application denied with costs in all courts.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Poucher v. Teachers' R. Board, 164 N.E. 335, 249 N.Y. 414, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 823 (N.Y. 1928).

164 N.E. 335 (Matter of Poucher v. Teachers' R. Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cochran v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
131 A.D.2d 351 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Guzman v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
379 N.E.2d 1189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Matter of Creveling v. Teachers' Ret. Board
174 N.E. 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
Creveling v. Teachers' Retirement Board
229 A.D. 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)