Matter of Platt v. Russo

2018 NY Slip Op 5548

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 5548 (Matter of Platt v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Platt v. Russo, 2018 NY Slip Op 5548 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Matter of Platt v Russo (2018 NY Slip Op 05548)
Matter of Platt v Russo
2018 NY Slip Op 05548
Decided on July 26, 2018
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: July 26, 2018


[*1]In the Matter of DONALD PLATT,

v

ANTHONY RUSSO, as Deputy Superintendent of Security, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.


Calendar Date: June 11, 2018
Before: Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Clark, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

Donald Platt, Napanoch, appellant pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of counsel), for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Mott, J.), entered August 25, 2017 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, denied petitioner's motion to reargue.

Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction due to petitioner's failure to effect service in accordance with the terms of the order to show cause. The court denied petitioner's subsequent motion to reargue, which claimed that the court had overlooked or misapprehended facts and law when it dismissed the petition. Petitioner appeals solely from the judgment denying his motion to reargue.

No appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Matter of Barnes v Annucci, 144 AD3d 1286, 1287 [2016]; People ex rel. Adams v Cunningham, 134 AD3d 1258, 1259 [2015]). As such, the appeal from said judgment must be dismissed.

Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Clark, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Adams v. Cunningham
134 A.D.3d 1258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Barnes v. Annucci
144 A.D.3d 1286 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 5548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-platt-v-russo-nyappdiv-2018.