Matter of Pitney

78 N.E. 1110, 186 N.Y. 540, 24 Bedell 540, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1192
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 1906·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The selection of a new or substituted trustee rested in the discretion of the Supreme Court and is not subject to review by this court.

It is-extremely doubtful, to say the least, whether the infant has any interest in the corpus of the trust fund. Therefore, the compensation for the services of the guardian was necessarily limited to taxed costs and the court was not authorized to make him an allowance. (Matter of Holden, 126 N. Y. 589 ; Matter of Robinson, 40 App. Div. 30 ; affd., 160 N. Y. 448.)

The order appealed from should be modified so as to strike out the allowance to the guardian ad litem, and in lieu thereof direct that said guardian be paid his costs to be taxed, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Matter of Pitney, 78 N.E. 1110, 186 N.Y. 540, 24 Bedell 540, 1906 N.Y. LEXIS 1192 (N.Y. 1906).

78 N.E. 1110 (Matter of Pitney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Price
165 Misc. 474 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1937)
In re the Estate of Wardman
154 Misc. 255 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
In re the Estate of Chapal
161 Misc. 67 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Proceedings of Montgomery
18 Mills Surr. 525 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1917)
Spencer v. . Spencer
114 N.E. 849 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
E. E. Souther Iron Co. v. Woodruff Realty Co.
158 S.W. 69 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1913)