Matter of Peters

1960 OK CR 39, 351 P.2d 1020, 1960 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 139
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 27, 1960
DocketA-12888
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1960 OK CR 39 (Matter of Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Peters, 1960 OK CR 39, 351 P.2d 1020, 1960 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 139 (Okla. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

BRETT, Judge.

This is an original action by Tom Peters, who complains that he has been unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Murray County, Oklahoma.

It appears that the cause of said restraint was by reason of an information filed in the District Court of Murray County, Oklahoma, wherein petitioner, Tom Peters, was charged with having committed the crime of murder of one, Billy Don Sullivan, on March 6, 1960, in said County and State.

It further appears that he was granted a preliminary hearing in the Justice of the Peace Court, Honorable Frank Turner, Justice of the Peace, presiding, on March 8, 1960, where he was denied bail.

It also appears that on March 8, 1960, he made application to the District Court of Murray County, Honorable W. J. Monroe, District Judge, presiding, wherein, again, he was committed on said charge without hail.

On April 8, 1960, he filed his application for bail in this Court. A rule to show cause was issued and the matter was set for hearing on April 20, 1960, at which the witnesses were sworn and heard, and the transcript of the proceedings in District Court offered in evidence for and against the granting of bail.

The court being fully advised in the premises, finds that the proof of guilt was not evident, nor the presumption thereof great, that the petitioner, if found guilty upon the charge as made in the information on file in the District Court, would receive the death penalty or life imprisonment. Wilson v. State, 92 Okl.Cr. 388, 223 P.2d 561; Ex parte Spears, 85 Okl.Cr. 101, 185 P.2d 479. Under such conditions this court has repeatedly held, that the petitioner should be admitted to bail.

This court is of the opinion that bail should be granted in the sum of $20,000, said bond to be conditioned as provided by law, to be approved by the Court Clerk of Murray County, that when said bond is given and approved by the Court Clerk of said county, the petitioner should be discharged from custody to await further orders of the Court.

NIX, J., concurs. POWELL, P. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No. 73-264 (1973) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports, 1973
In re Habeas Corpus of Harvell
1962 OK CR 63 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1962)
Application of Wallace
1960 OK CR 110 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1960)
Application of Pierce
1960 OK CR 81 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1960 OK CR 39, 351 P.2d 1020, 1960 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-peters-oklacrimapp-1960.