Matter of People of the State of New York ex rel. Jeremiah Griffin v. Warden, NYC Dept. of Corr.

2025 NY Slip Op 01594
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 18, 2025
DocketInd. No. 70271/24; Appeal No. 3931; Case No. 2024-05711
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 01594 (Matter of People of the State of New York ex rel. Jeremiah Griffin v. Warden, NYC Dept. of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of People of the State of New York ex rel. Jeremiah Griffin v. Warden, NYC Dept. of Corr., 2025 NY Slip Op 01594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Matter of People of the State of New York ex rel. Jeremiah Griffin v Warden, NYC Dept. of Corr. (2025 NY Slip Op 01594)
Matter of People of the State of New York ex rel. Jeremiah Griffin v Warden, NYC Dept. of Corr.
2025 NY Slip Op 01594
Decided on March 18, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 18, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Kennedy, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Ind. No. 70271/24|Appeal No. 3931|Case No. 2024-05711|

[*1]In the Matter of The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jeremiah Griffin, Petitioner-Appellant,

v

Warden, NYC Department of Corrections, Respondent.


Jeremiah J. Griffin, appellant pro se.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Alex King of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (April A. Newbauer, J.), entered August 20, 2024, denying the petitioner for a writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The majority of petitioner's claims, including that his speedy trial rights were violated and that the complaining witness wants the charges against petitioner dropped, are unpreserved (see e.g. People ex rel. Witty v Warden of Rikers Is. Correctional Facility, 248 AD2d 333 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 91 NY2d 814 [1998]), and we decline to consider these claims in the interest of justice.

As for the claims that are preserved, we find that the court properly denied the petition (see People ex rel. Grant v Scully, 190 AD2d 543 [1st Dept 1993], appeal dismissed 92 NY2d 946 [1998]; People ex rel. Kitchen v White, 158 AD2d 437, 437 [1st Dept 1990], lv denied 76 NY2d 702 [1990]; see also People ex rel. Harrington v Cully, 103 AD3d 1093, 1093 [4th Dept 2013]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 18, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Harrington v. Cully
103 A.D.3d 1093 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People ex. rel. Grant v. Scully
190 A.D.2d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People ex rel. Witty v. Warden of Rucers Island Correctional Facility
248 A.D.2d 333 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 01594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-people-of-the-state-of-new-york-ex-rel-jeremiah-griffin-v-nyappdiv-2025.