Matter of Patouhas v. Colangelo

2018 NY Slip Op 8939

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: December 26, 2018
• Docket: 2018-12846
• Status: Published

Opinion

Matter of Patouhas v Colangelo

2018 NY Slip Op 08939

Decided on December 26, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 26, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2018-12846

[*1]In the Matter of Phillip J. Patouhas, petitioner,

v

John P. Colangelo, etc., et al., respondents. Philip J. Patouhas, Rye, NY, petitioner pro se.

The Kitson Law Firm, PLLC, White Plains, NY (Dina S. Kaplan of counsel), for respondent Christine Patouhas.

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent Honorable John P. Colangelo, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, from presiding over a trial in an action entitled Patouhas v Patouhas , pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under Index No. 52354/16.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman , 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v Mordue , 68 NY2d 348, 352).

The petitioner has failed to establish a clear legal right to the relief sought.

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, HINDS-RADIX and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court