Matter of Pastrana v. Nazario

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of Pastrana v. Nazario

138 A.D.3d 998, 28 N.Y.S.3d 620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 2016

Docket2014-06433

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 A.D.3d 998 (Matter of Pastrana v. Nazario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of Pastrana v. Nazario, 138 A.D.3d 998, 28 N.Y.S.3d 620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of commitment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part) (Patricia E. Henry, J.), dated September 17, 2013. The order of commitment committed the father to the custody of the New York City Department of Correction for a term of 27 months, upon an order of the same court dated March 7, 2013, which, after a hearing, adjudged the father to be in willful violation of an order of protection of that court dated April 23, 2010.

Ordered that the appeal from the order of commitment is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The term of 27 months for which the father was committed has expired. Therefore, the father’s appeal from the order of *999 commitment which committed him to the custody of the New York City Department of Correction for a term of 27 months has been rendered academic (see Matter of Braslow v Braslow, 124 AD3d 647, 647-648 [2015]; Matter of King v Edwards, 92 AD3d 783, 784 [2012]; Matter of Bibolova v Radu, 82 AD3d 1222, 1222 [2011]; Matter of Rubackin v Rubackin, 62 AD3d 11, 12 [2009]).

Rivera, J.R, Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of commitment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part) (Patricia E. Henry, J.), dated September 17, 2013. The order of commitment committed the father to the custody of the New York City Department of Correction for a term of 27 months, upon an order of the same court dated March 7, 2013, which, after a hearing, adjudged the father to be in willful violation of an order of protection of that court dated April 23, 2010.

Ordered that the appeal from the order of commitment is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The term of 27 months for which the father was committed has expired. Therefore, the father’s appeal from the order of *999 commitment which committed him to the custody of the New York City Department of Correction for a term of 27 months has been rendered academic (see Matter of Braslow v Braslow, 124 AD3d 647, 647-648 [2015]; Matter of King v Edwards, 92 AD3d 783, 784 [2012]; Matter of Bibolova v Radu, 82 AD3d 1222, 1222 [2011]; Matter of Rubackin v Rubackin, 62 AD3d 11, 12 [2009]).

Rivera, J.R, Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.3d 998, 28 N.Y.S.3d 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-pastrana-v-nazario-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack