Matter of Palmer v. . Mann
143 N.E. 765, 237 N.Y. 616, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 917
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Palmer v. . Mann, 143 N.E. 765, 237 N.Y. 616, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 917 (N.Y. 1924).
143 N.E. 765 (Matter of Palmer v. . Mann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ruth Campbell v. County Commission of Franklin County, Defendant/Respondent, and Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri, Intervenor-Defendant/Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014
State Ex Rel. Freeze v. City of Cape Girardeau
523 S.W.2d 123 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1975)
Chase v. City of Glen Cove
41 Misc. 2d 889 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
2525 East Avenue, Inc. v. Town of Brighton
33 Misc. 2d 1029 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Village of Larchmont v. Sutton
30 Misc. 2d 245 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Holly Development, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners
342 P.2d 1032 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1959)
Giuliano v. Entress
4 Misc. 2d 546 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Richardson v. City of Lockport
2 Misc. 2d 548 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Melita v. Nolan
126 Misc. 345 (New York Supreme Court, 1926)