Matter of Palazzolo v. Giresi-Palazzolo

138 A.D.3d 866, 28 N.Y.S.3d 348
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 13, 2016
Docket2015-02867
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 138 A.D.3d 866 (Matter of Palazzolo v. Giresi-Palazzolo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Palazzolo v. Giresi-Palazzolo, 138 A.D.3d 866, 28 N.Y.S.3d 348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Anne-Marie Jolly, J.), dated March 26, 2015. The order, in effect, after a hearing, dismissed a violation petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The father commenced this violation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 against the mother, alleging that she violated a prior court order directing her to enroll the subject children in therapy. At a hearing, the mother testified that on the day of the prior court order, she scheduled an intake appointment for the children. She subsequently had the children complete their intake appointment, and scheduled the children’s first therapy session. However, the mother asserted that the children, who were teenagers, adamantly refused to attend the therapy appointment.

*867 To establish a willful violation of a Family Court order, the petitioner has the burden of proving his or her case by clear and convincing evidence (see Matter of Cobane v Cobane, 57 AD3d 1320, 1322-1323 [2008]; Matter of Blaize F, 48 AD3d 1007, 1008 [2008]). Under the facts of this case, the Family Court properly found that the father failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the mother wilfully violated the Family Court order to have the subject children attend therapy. Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the violation petition.

Balkin, J.P., Roman, Maltese and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Davis v. Romao
2025 NY Slip Op 02772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Morales v. Diaz
2024 NY Slip Op 06610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Matter of Ramsey v. Faustin
213 A.D.3d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Quattrochi v. Negri
2020 NY Slip Op 05759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Matter of Paliani v. Selapack
2019 NY Slip Op 9170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Unczur v. Welch
2018 NY Slip Op 1757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Thompson v. Wood
2017 NY Slip Op 9219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Young v. Rios
2017 NY Slip Op 5007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.3d 866, 28 N.Y.S.3d 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-palazzolo-v-giresi-palazzolo-nyappdiv-2016.