Matter of Pagnani v. Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs.

2017 NY Slip Op 5734, 152 A.D.3d 696, 55 N.Y.S.3d 912
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 14, 2017
Docket2016-03307
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 5734 (Matter of Pagnani v. Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Pagnani v. Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 5734, 152 A.D.3d 696, 55 N.Y.S.3d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York dated May 18, 2015, which, after a fair hearing pursuant to Social Services Law § 22, upheld a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Social Services dated September 12, 2014, that the petitioner was ineligible for Medicaid benefits due to her failure to submit proper documentation.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

In reviewing a Medicaid eligibility determination made after a fair hearing, the court must review the record, as a whole, to determine if the agency’s decisions are supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Bosco v McGuire, 111 AD3d 931, 932 [2013]). “Substantial evidence means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact. The petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating eligibility” (Matter of Loiacono v Demarzo, 72 AD3d 969, 969-970 [2010] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]).

Here, the determination of the Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York that the petitioner did not establish good cause for her failure to provide in a timely manner documents necessary for the processing of her application for Medicaid benefits is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Bosco v McGuire, 111 AD3d at 932; Matter of Frohlinger v DeBuono, 278 AD2d 323, 324 [2000]).

Dillon, J.P., Hinds-Radix, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Estate of Gerhardt Wise v. New York State Dept. of Health
2026 NY Slip Op 00375 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Matter of Mills Pond Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr. v. New York State Dept. of Health
2025 NY Slip Op 04480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Anand v. New York State Dept. of Health
2021 NY Slip Op 04350 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Hill v. Zucker
2019 NY Slip Op 3488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Mangels v. Zucker
2019 NY Slip Op 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Schaffer v. Zucker
2018 NY Slip Op 7313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Medford Multicare Ctr. v. Zucker
2018 NY Slip Op 3837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 5734, 152 A.D.3d 696, 55 N.Y.S.3d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-pagnani-v-suffolk-county-dept-of-social-servs-nyappdiv-2017.