MATTER OF OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT v. Richards

100 N.Y.2d 637
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 30, 2003
StatusPublished

This text of 100 N.Y.2d 637 (MATTER OF OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT v. Richards, 100 N.Y.2d 637 (N.Y. 2003).

Opinion

100 N.Y.2d 637 (2003)

In the Matter of OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT, On Behalf of JENNIFER LITTLE, Respondent,
v.
BRIAN M. RICHARDS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted June 23, 2003.
Decided October 30, 2003.

*638 Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see e.g. Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298). Motions for a stay, a preference and poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 N.Y.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-oswego-county-support-collection-unit-v--ny-2003.