Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT v. Richards

MATTER OF OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT v. Richards

100 N.Y.2d 637
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 30, 2003·Published

Opinion

100 N.Y.2d 637 (2003)

In the Matter of OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT, On Behalf of JENNIFER LITTLE, Respondent,
v.
BRIAN M. RICHARDS, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted June 23, 2003.
Decided October 30, 2003.

*638 Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see e.g. Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298). Motions for a stay, a preference and poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATTER OF OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT v. Richards, 100 N.Y.2d 637 (N.Y. 2003).

100 N.Y.2d 637 (MATTER OF OSWEGO COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)