Matter of Onisk v. Knaust Bros.
166 N.E. 327, 250 N.Y. 569, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 957
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Onisk v. Knaust Bros., 166 N.E. 327, 250 N.Y. 569, 1929 N.Y. LEXIS 957 (N.Y. 1929).
166 N.E. 327 (Matter of Onisk v. Knaust Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grisanzio v. Cafiso
28 A.D.2d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
Venho v. Ostrander Railway & Timber Co.
52 P.2d 1267 (Washington Supreme Court, 1936)