MATTER OF OLEET v. Hildreth

135 N.E.2d 595, 1 N.Y.2d 798
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 24, 1956
StatusPublished

This text of 135 N.E.2d 595 (MATTER OF OLEET v. Hildreth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF OLEET v. Hildreth, 135 N.E.2d 595, 1 N.Y.2d 798 (N.Y. 1956).

Opinion

1 N.Y.2d 798 (1956)

In the Matter of Rae A. Oleet, Respondent,
v.
Elmer Hildreth et al., as Members of the Common Council of the City of Mount Vernon, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued April 16, 1956.
Decided May 24, 1956.

Vernon F. Murphy for appellants.

Arthur H. Ellis for Board of Education of City School District of the City of Mount Vernon, amicus curię, in support of appellants' position.

Herbert W. Aronson for respondent.

William Macy, Corporation Counsel, for Joseph P. Vaccarella, as Mayor of the City of Mount Vernon, amicus curię, in support of respondent's position.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oleet v. Hildreth
135 N.E.2d 595 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 N.E.2d 595, 1 N.Y.2d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-oleet-v-hildreth-ny-1956.