Matter of O'Brien

99 N.E. 1111, 206 N.Y. 694, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1110
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 25, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 99 N.E. 1111 (Matter of O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of O'Brien, 99 N.E. 1111, 206 N.Y. 694, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1110 (N.Y. 1912).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The prevailing opinion of the Appellate Division expressed the conclusion that the certificate of nomination attacked in this proceeding did not have the number of signers required by the statute, and proceeded to discuss the questions involved upon the merits because such alleged defect in the certificate had been waived by the interested parties. We disapprove that conclusion upon the authority of People ex rel. Hotchkiss v. Smith (206 N. Y. 231), recently decided by us. We approve the reasoning of that opinion upon the merits of the controversy presented by these appeals and affirm the order of the Appellate Division thereon, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rosett v. Heffernan
187 Misc. 598 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Matter of Peel v. Cohen
192 N.E. 785 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Matter of Straus
193 N.E. 338 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
In re Peel
242 A.D. 264 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
In re Hastings
210 A.D. 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 N.E. 1111, 206 N.Y. 694, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-obrien-ny-1912.