Matter of Nyomi B. (Nefreida W.)

130 A.D.3d 719, 11 N.Y.S.3d 880
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 8, 2015
Docket2013-11345
StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.3d 719 (Matter of Nyomi B. (Nefreida W.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Nyomi B. (Nefreida W.), 130 A.D.3d 719, 11 N.Y.S.3d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (William Franc Perry, J.), dated October 31, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, after a hearing, in effect, granted the branch of the mother’s petition which sought visitation with the subject child in Ohio rather than in New York during the subject child’s winter, spring, and summer school recesses.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new hearing and a new determination of the mother’s petition thereafter, in accordance herewith.

The attorney for the child on this appeal has raised significant issues regarding developments that have arisen since the date of the order on appeal that preclude this Court from determining if the visitation arrangement with the mother in Ohio during the subject child’s winter, spring, and summer school recesses is in the child’s best interests (see Matter of Michael B., 80 NY2d 299, 318 [1992]; Gillis v Gillis, 113 AD3d 816, 817 [2014]; Matter of Gatke v Johnson, 50 AD3d 798 [2008]). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for a new hearing and a new determination of the mother’s petition thereafter. We express no opinion as to the appropriate determination. Dillon, J.P., Chambers, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Michael B.
604 N.E.2d 122 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
Gatke v. Johnson
50 A.D.3d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Gillis v. Gillis
113 A.D.3d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A.D.3d 719, 11 N.Y.S.3d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-nyomi-b-nefreida-w-nyappdiv-2015.