Matter of Nylah E. (Noemi C.)

2020 NY Slip Op 3451, 184 A.D.3d 467, 124 N.Y.S.3d 186
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 18, 2020
Docket22799/18 11657A 11657
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 3451 (Matter of Nylah E. (Noemi C.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Nylah E. (Noemi C.), 2020 NY Slip Op 3451, 184 A.D.3d 467, 124 N.Y.S.3d 186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Matter of Nylah E. (Noemi C.) (2020 NY Slip Op 03451)
Matter of Nylah E. (Noemi C.)
2020 NY Slip Op 03451
Decided on June 18, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 18, 2020
Acosta, P.J., Richter, Mazzarelli, Webber, González, JJ.

22799/18 11657A 11657

[*1] In re Nylah E., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Noemi C., Respondent-Appellant, Theodore E., Respondent, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner-Respondent.


Daniel R. Katz, New York, for appellant.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kevin Osowski of counsel), for respondent.

Dawne A. Mitchell, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Susan Clement of counsel), attorney for the child.



Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (David J. Kaplan, J.), entered on or about June 12, 2019, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about June 5, 2019, which, after a hearing, found that respondent mother neglected the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the fact-finding order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.

Petitioner agency proved by a preponderance of the evidence that respondent neglected the child (see Family Court Act §§ 1012[f][i][B]; 1046[b][i]). The record shows that respondent's lack of insight into caring for the newborn child, coupled with her misuse of alcohol, placed the child in imminent danger of physical impairment (see Matter of Noah Jeremiah J. [Kimberly J.], 81 AD3d 37, 44 [1st Dept 2010]; see also Matter of Isaiah M. [Antoya M.], 96 AD3d 516 [1st Dept 2012]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 18, 2020

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of L.R.E. (LaPorsche E.)
2025 NY Slip Op 06250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Ariel A.T.R. (Timothy R.)
222 A.D.3d 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 3451, 184 A.D.3d 467, 124 N.Y.S.3d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-nylah-e-noemi-c-nyappdiv-2020.