Matter of Norton
70 N.E. 1103, 178 N.Y. 606, 16 Bedell 606, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 852
Opinion
We approve of the opinion helow in so far as it holds that the surrogate had jurisdiction to authorize the administrators to compromise the claim of Hall against the estate. As to the wisdom of authorizing a compromise that involves a discretion of the court below which we have no power to review.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner,' JJ. Not voting: O’Brien, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Matter of Norton, 70 N.E. 1103, 178 N.Y. 606, 16 Bedell 606, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 852 (N.Y. 1904).
70 N.E. 1103 (Matter of Norton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCarron v. New York Central Railroad
239 Mass. 64 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)