Home/New York Court of Appeals/Matter of Norman v. the Bd. of Educ., N.Y.

Matter of Norman v. the Bd. of Educ., N.Y.

96 N.E. 406, 203 N.Y. 548, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 845
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 10, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by32 cases

This text of 96 N.E. 406 (Matter of Norman v. the Bd. of Educ., N.Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Norman v. the Bd. of Educ., N.Y., 96 N.E. 406, 203 N.Y. 548, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 845 (N.Y. 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Order affirmed for the reason that even if subdivision 12 of section 67 of the by-laws of the board of education of the city of New York should be held unreasonable, and said board should have passed upon the relator’s nomination by the board of superintendents in disregard of such by-law, the application to the court for a writ of mandamus was not made within forty days from the filing of such recommendation in the office of the secretary of said board of education and while a vacancy existed to which said board could have appointed the relator. The other questions presented upon this appeal are not passed upon. No costs are allowed on this appeal.

Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nissula v. Southern Idaho Timber Protective Ass'n
245 P.2d 400 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1952)
Walker v. Johnston
236 S.W.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1951)
Capello's Admr. v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.
68 A.2d 913 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1949)
President & Directors of Georgetown College v. Hughes
130 F.2d 810 (D.C. Circuit, 1942)
Andrews v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n
226 Iowa 374 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1939)
Andrews v. Y.M.C.A.
284 N.W. 186 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1939)
Still v. Union Circulation Co.
101 F.2d 11 (Second Circuit, 1939)
Fox v. Lavender
56 P.2d 1049 (Utah Supreme Court, 1936)
Oklahoma Railway Co. v. City of Guthrie
1935 OK 1167 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Donaldson
156 So. 859 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1934)
Cohen v. General Hospital Society
154 A. 435 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1931)
Johnson v. Jim Brownlee, Inc.
127 So. 127 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Henry W. Putnam Memorial Hospital v. Allen
34 F.2d 927 (Second Circuit, 1929)
Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Salvation Army
256 P. 1106 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
Bunnell v. Waterbury Hospital
131 A. 501 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1925)
Macale v. Lynch
188 P. 517 (Washington Supreme Court, 1920)
Swansea Lease, Inc. v. Molloy
183 P. 740 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1919)
Badertscher v. Independent Ice Co.
184 P. 181 (Utah Supreme Court, 1919)
Randolph v. Hunt
183 P. 358 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Cook v. John N. Norton Memorial Infirmary
202 S.W. 874 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.E. 406, 203 N.Y. 548, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-norman-v-the-bd-of-educ-ny-ny-1911.