Matter of Nichols v. Miller

2020 NY Slip Op 3917, 125 N.Y.S.3d 306, 185 A.D.3d 828
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 2020
Docket2019-13337
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 3917 (Matter of Nichols v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of Nichols v. Miller, 2020 NY Slip Op 3917, 125 N.Y.S.3d 306, 185 A.D.3d 828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Matter of Nichols v Miller (2020 NY Slip Op 03917)
Matter of Nichols v Miller
2020 NY Slip Op 03917
Decided on July 15, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 15, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
BETSY BARROS
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2019-13337 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

[*1]In the Matter of Owen Nichols, petitioner,

v

William Miller, etc., et al., respondents. Owen Nichols, East Elmhurst, NY, petitioner pro se.


Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for respondent William Miller.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Ann Bordley, and Coby Ballard of counsel), respondent pro se.



Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition and mandamus to prohibit the respondents from proceeding in a criminal action entitled People v Nichols , pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Indictment No. 7682/18, and to compel the respondents to dismiss the indictment in that action, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, this Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 7804[b]; 506[b]; Matter of Nolan v Lungen , 61 NY2d 788, 789-790).

RIVERA, J.P., DUFFY, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nolan v. Lungen
461 N.E.2d 874 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 3917, 125 N.Y.S.3d 306, 185 A.D.3d 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-nichols-v-miller-nyappdiv-2020.