Home/New York Court of Appeals/MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. Wanamaker

MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. Wanamaker

139 N.E.2d 150, 2 N.Y.2d 764
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 15, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 139 N.E.2d 150 (MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. Wanamaker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MATTER OF NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. v. Wanamaker, 139 N.E.2d 150, 2 N.Y.2d 764 (N.Y. 1956).

Opinion

2 N.Y.2d 764 (1956)

In the Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Respondent-Appellant,
v.
George W. Wanamaker, as Director of Erie County Sales Tax, Appellant-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued October 9, 1956.
Decided November 15, 1956.

Elmer R. Weil, County Attorney (Maurice J. Rumizen and John S. Ryan of counsel), for appellant-respondent.

Daniel G. Yorkey, James A. O'Neill, Alexander C. Cordes and Donald F. Runyan for respondent-appellant.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Constellation Nuclear Power Plants LLC v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New York
131 A.D.3d 185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Emerson Electric Co. v. Director of Revenue
204 S.W.3d 642 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2006)
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Director of Revenue
182 S.W.3d 226 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2005)
Utilicorp United, Inc. v. Director of Revenue
75 S.W.3d 725 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2001)
Sharp v. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc.
919 S.W.2d 157 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
John Sharp, Comptroller of Public Accounts, and Dan Morales, Attorney General of Texas v. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc., Successor-In-Interest to Tyler Pipe Industries of Texas, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Watertown Board of Assessors
216 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Atlantic City Electric Co. v. Director
7 N.J. Tax 554 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1985)
Imperial Manufacturing Co. v. State Tax Commission
99 A.D.2d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Millington Quarry, Inc. v. Taxation Division Director
5 N.J. Tax 144 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1983)
Slattery Associates, Inc. v. Tully
79 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Richardson v. State Tax Commission
604 P.2d 719 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1979)
Burger King, Inc. v. State Tax Commission
70 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 N.E.2d 150, 2 N.Y.2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-niagara-mohawk-power-corp-v-wanamaker-ny-1956.