Matter of New York Telephone Co., (Canough)

49 N.E.2d 999, 290 N.Y. 537, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1076
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 18, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 49 N.E.2d 999 (Matter of New York Telephone Co., (Canough)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Matter of New York Telephone Co., (Canough), 49 N.E.2d 999, 290 N.Y. 537, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1076 (N.Y. 1943).

Opinion

*544 Per Curiam.

The orders should be affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Matter of New York Telephone Co. v. Ferris (257 App. Div. 415, 282 N. Y. 667).

There is no conflict between the Ferris case and People ex rel. New York Edison Co. v. Feitner (99 App. Div. 274, 181 N. Y. 549). The Tax Law has long defined real property ” as including “ All mains, pipes and tanks laid or placed in, upon, above or under any public or private street or place for conducting steam, heat, water, oil, electricity * * *.” (§ 2, subd. 6). This provision was held by the Feitner case not to include equipment which the Edison Company had placed in private premises of its customers for the purpose of connecting the premises with the company’s feed mains in the street. The decision was that such equipment was not laid or placed in, upon, above or under any public or private street or place.” The word “ place,” as so used, was taken by the court to signify a short thoroughfare or square.

The orders should be affirmed, with costs.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur; Lewis, J., taking no part.

Orders affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of T-Mobile Northeast, LLC v. DeBellis
32 N.Y.3d 594 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)
Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. City of Middletown Assessor
269 A.D.2d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
AT&T Information Systems, Inc. v. City of New York
137 A.D.2d 7 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Lees v. City of Syracuse
91 Misc. 2d 637 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
Metropolitan Bank v. Department of Assessment
57 A.D.2d 1055 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Crystal v. City of Syracuse, Department of Assessment
47 A.D.2d 29 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
People ex rel. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. Chambers
1 Misc. 2d 990 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
People ex rel. New York Telephone Co. v. Taylor
187 Misc. 550 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
People ex rel. Upstate Telephone Corp. v. Eaton
185 Misc. 396 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
Matter of New York Telephone Company
52 N.E.2d 595 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 N.E.2d 999, 290 N.Y. 537, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-new-york-telephone-co-canough-ny-1943.