Matter of New York Schools Ins. Recriprocal v. Staines

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Matter of New York Schools Ins. Recriprocal v. Staines

132 A.D.3d 874, 17 N.Y.S.3d 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 2015

Docket2014-08762

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.3d 874 (Matter of New York Schools Ins. Recriprocal v. Staines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Matter of New York Schools Ins. Recriprocal v. Staines, 132 A.D.3d 874, 17 N.Y.S.3d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for supplementary uninsured/ underinsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of *875 the Supreme Court, Nassau County (K. Murphy, J.), entered July 10, 2014, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim made by James Staines against the petitioner for supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits. The Supreme Court should have denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Although Staines did not comply with a provision of the subject insurance policy requiring him to “immediately” forward to the petitioner the summons and complaint in his action against the motorist who was allegedly at fault in the subject accident, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that it suffered any prejudice resulting from his delay in doing so (see Matter of Brandon [Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.], 97 NY2d 491, 498 [2002]; Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Reinhardt, 27 AD3d 751, 752 [2006]; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Sparacio, 297 AD2d 284, 285 [2002]).

Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Dickerson and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for supplementary uninsured/ underinsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of *875 the Supreme Court, Nassau County (K. Murphy, J.), entered July 10, 2014, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed.

The petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim made by James Staines against the petitioner for supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits. The Supreme Court should have denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Although Staines did not comply with a provision of the subject insurance policy requiring him to “immediately” forward to the petitioner the summons and complaint in his action against the motorist who was allegedly at fault in the subject accident, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that it suffered any prejudice resulting from his delay in doing so (see Matter of Brandon [Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.], 97 NY2d 491, 498 [2002]; Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Reinhardt, 27 AD3d 751, 752 [2006]; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Sparacio, 297 AD2d 284, 285 [2002]).

Rivera, J.R, Balkin, Dickerson and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.3d 874, 17 N.Y.S.3d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/matter-of-new-york-schools-ins-recriprocal-v-staines-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack